Icatibant
| Evidence Level: L5 | Predicted Indications: 10 |
Table of Contents
- Icatibant
- Icatibant: From Undocumented Original Indication to C1 Inhibitor Deficiency (Hereditary Angioedema)
Icatibant: From Undocumented Original Indication to C1 Inhibitor Deficiency (Hereditary Angioedema)
One-Sentence Summary
Icatibant’s original approved indication is not available in the structured regulatory data provided (drug is currently Not marketed/not marketed in this jurisdiction, 0 licenses on file). The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for C1 Inhibitor Deficiency, with 23 clinical trials and 20 publications currently supporting this direction — though this evidence largely describes Icatibant’s already-established use in Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) rather than a novel repurposing hypothesis (see rationale below).
Quick Overview
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Original Indication | Not available in regulatory data (no licenses on file). Literature evidence (e.g., PMID 21284353) indicates Icatibant is authorised elsewhere for acute attacks of Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) |
| Predicted New Indication | C1 Inhibitor Deficiency |
| TxGNN Prediction Score | 99.99% |
| Evidence Level | L1 (≥2 completed Phase 3 RCTs) |
| EU Market Status | Not marketed (Not marketed) |
| Number of Authorizations | 0 |
| Recommended Decision | Hold |
Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
Detailed mechanism-of-action data is flagged as a data gap in DrugBank for this record. However, the evidence pack’s own literature abstracts consistently describe Icatibant as a synthetic decapeptide and selective bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist (PMID 24925394, PMID 21284353), used to block the bradykinin-mediated vascular permeability that drives angioedema attacks.
C1 Inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency causes uncontrolled activation of the kallikrein-kinin system, resulting in excess bradykinin and the swelling attacks characteristic of Hereditary Angioedema. Blocking the bradykinin B2 receptor directly counteracts this downstream mechanism, which is mechanistically coherent regardless of whether C1-INH function is restored.
Importantly, the trial and literature evidence in this pack (e.g., NCT00097695, NCT00912093, PMID 21284353 noting Icatibant “is now authorised in the European Union”) indicates that Icatibant is already an established treatment for HAE due to C1-INH deficiency in multiple markets. This means the TxGNN “prediction” here largely reflects a true, already-known drug–disease relationship rather than a genuinely novel repurposing candidate. The practical question for this jurisdiction is less “is this mechanistically plausible” and more “why is the drug not yet marketed here, and what local regulatory/safety data is missing.”
Clinical Trial Evidence
Note: the disease-level search also returned trials for competitor drugs in the same disease space (BCX7353, KVD900, lanadelumab, plasma-derived/recombinant C1-INH concentrate, GNR-038) — these are excluded below as not directly evaluating Icatibant. The table lists the most relevant Icatibant-specific trials.
| Trial Number | Phase | Status | Enrollment | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT00097695 | Phase 3 | Completed | 84 | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of SC icatibant for acute cutaneous/abdominal HAE attacks (pivotal registration trial) |
| NCT00912093 | Phase 3 | Completed | 98 | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study confirming efficacy and safety of icatibant vs. placebo for acute HAE attacks |
| NCT00500656 | Phase 3 | Completed | 85 | Randomized, controlled, parallel-group study comparing SC icatibant vs. oral tranexamic acid; icatibant showed faster time to symptom relief |
| NCT00997204 | Phase 3 | Completed | 151 | Open-label, multicenter study of self-administered SC icatibant — confirmed safety, tolerability, and convenience of home self-treatment |
| NCT03888755 | Phase 3 | Completed | 8 | Open-label study of icatibant efficacy, PK, and safety in Japanese HAE type I/II patients |
| NCT01386658 | Phase 3 | Completed | 32 | Multicenter, non-randomized PK/safety/tolerability study of single-dose icatibant in pediatric/adolescent HAE patients |
| NCT04654351 | Phase 3 | Completed | 2 | Non-randomized study of SC icatibant safety, efficacy, and PK in Japanese children/adolescents with acute HAE attacks |
| NCT01457430 | Phase 4 | Completed | 19 | Open-label study confirming self-administered icatibant does not change time to symptom resolution vs. clinic administration |
| NCT07290855 | Phase 4 | Completed | 5 | Safety/efficacy of icatibant injection (Icanticure®) for bradykinin-induced angioedema; notes NHI Taiwan reimbursement for diagnosed HAE |
| NCT01034969 | N/A (Registry) | Completed | 1,761 | Icatibant Outcome Survey (IOS) — large prospective real-world registry documenting routine clinical safety/effectiveness outcomes |
Literature Evidence
| PMID | Year | Type | Journal | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21284353 | 2010 | Review | Prescrire International | Confirms icatibant (bradykinin B2 antagonist) authorised in the EU for HAE attacks; positions it relative to C1 esterase inhibitor |
| 29757016 | 2018 | Review | Expert Rev Clin Immunol | Reviews RCT and open-label extension data supporting icatibant safety/efficacy in adolescents and children (≥2 years) with C1-INH-HAE |
| 23420425 | 2013 | Systematic Review | Pneumonol Alergol Pol | Comparative effectiveness review of conestat alfa, human C1 esterase inhibitor, and icatibant for acute HAE attacks |
| 22686628 | 2012 | Observational | Allergy | Real-world study of icatibant in 8 patients with acquired C1-INH deficiency angioedema; 48 attacks treated with SC icatibant 30mg |
| 35662289 | 2022 | Registry-based | Clin Exp Allergy | Registry analysis of icatibant and C1-inhibitor use specifically for laryngeal HAE attacks |
| 34965883 | 2021 | Observational (Registry) | Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol | Icatibant Outcome Survey (IOS) data from Spain on HAE treatment outcomes |
| 35871284 | 2023 | Retrospective Study | J Clin Pharmacol | Retrospective review finding predominant off-label use of C1-INH concentrates and icatibant beyond the approved HAE indication |
| 30280305 | 2018 | Case Series | J Clin Immunol | Reports treatment of HAE attacks with icatibant and recombinant C1 inhibitor during pregnancy |
| 36044174 | 2022 | Review | Curr Allergy Asthma Rep | Reviews safety evidence for icatibant use during pregnancy, noting plasma-derived C1-INH remains first-line due to limited icatibant data |
| 37898409 | 2024 | Review | J Allergy Clin Immunol | Reviews HAE disease burden and treatment access (including icatibant) in the Asia-Pacific region |
EU Market Information
No marketing authorizations are on file for this jurisdiction (total_licenses = 0, market status: Not marketed/Not marketed). This is notable given the substantial global clinical evidence base above, and should be clarified as part of any further evaluation (e.g., is the product simply not yet filed here, or was it discontinued/never sought?).
Safety Considerations
Please refer to the SmPC for safety information.
Conclusion and Next Steps
Decision: Hold
Rationale:
- Efficacy evidence is strong (L1: ≥2 completed Phase 3 RCTs plus a large real-world registry of 1,761 patients), but this evidence documents Icatibant’s already-known role in HAE/C1-INH deficiency rather than a novel repurposing signal.
- A Blocking data gap exists — no TFDA/local label (warnings, contraindications) is available, which per the evidence pack explicitly prevents entry into the S1 safety pre-assessment stage. Combined with the absence of any local marketing authorization, the candidate cannot responsibly advance past Hold.
To proceed, the following is needed:
- TFDA (or equivalent local regulator) approved label: warnings, precautions, and contraindications (DG001)
- Confirmed mechanism-of-action documentation via DrugBank API (DG002)
- Drug-drug interaction (DDI) data — current query returned no results
- Clarification of local regulatory/market status: reason for absence of any marketing authorization despite mature global evidence, and whether this candidate should be framed as a “new market entry” rather than a “new indication”
Disclaimer
This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.